• This topic is empty.
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 21 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #3345 Reply

    whitertth
    Spectator

    routine excisional biopsy of fibroma on left cheek…. .5 watts 14/8 emla topical….pretty good hemostasis as well…..enjoy

    #10411 Reply

    whitertth
    Spectator

    here are the photos sorry…..

    fibromapre.jpg

    fibroma specimen.jpg

    fibromapost.jpg

    #10417 Reply

    Glenn van As
    Spectator

    HI Ron: neat pics, did you do this with the erbium?

    You got pretty good hemostasis with this one too.

    All the best. ….nice job.

    glenn

    #10409 Reply

    whitertth
    Spectator

    yes dome with the waterlase at .5 watts 14/8 after the removal i went back at the same power without water and very little air to apply my “laser bandaid” coating the defect with laser energy…i pressed on void with gauze for 20- 30 seconds and thats what i got…

    #10402 Reply

    Anonymous
    Guest

    Thought I’d add a fibroma case also.

    5mm diameter
    er,cr:YSGG 1.0 W EMLA 11/7

    Preop

    csmithpre2.jpg

    cslase.jpg

    Postop

    post523cs.jpg

    1 week

    csmith1weekcrop copy.jpg

    Ok, a few questions for you all.

    Should I have been more invasive and gone deeper?
    In this case after the piece was removed I went back and ‘resurfaced’

    Biopsy?
    Pt could pin point cause from trauma.
    Any suggestions?

    #10412 Reply

    ASI
    Spectator

    Hi, Fellow Rons,

    Very nice photos. Interesting that there’s no bleeding from the second case. Is that why you think it should be done a bit deeper?

    Andrew

    #10403 Reply

    Anonymous
    Guest
    QUOTE
    Quote: from ASI on 11:44 am on May 19, 2003
    Hi, Fellow Rons,

    Very nice photos.  Interesting that there’s no bleeding from the second case.  Is that why you think it should be done a bit deeper?

    Andrew

    Actually, most of the cases I’ve seen posted,here and elsewhere, seem to look like they are more cratered afterward. I didn’t create a crater with this one and was wondering if there is any long term diffrence.

    I’ve never had any bleeding to contend with on fibroma removals, just once in awhile on frenectomies.

    #10421 Reply

    Swpmn
    Spectator

    Looks real nice, Ron.

    I don’t think any need to go deeper or biopsy.

    Al

    #10413 Reply

    Benchwmer
    Spectator

    Is this a WaterLase only topic?
    If not stated differently I guess we are to assume WaterLase?
    I though we were going to give out treatment parameters, tip size, duration, etc.
    I never see Hertz posted in WaterLase posts, even if it is fixed, it would be helpful in treatment interpretation.
    Ron,
    What size tip did you use?
    I would place tissue in biopsy bottle, evaluate healing and even then keep to see if insurance will pay w/o biopsy report, never know when you need that tissue.

    Jeff

    #10404 Reply

    Anonymous
    Guest
    QUOTE
    Quote: from Benchwmer on 8:16 pm on May 19, 2003
    Is this a WaterLase only topic? If not stated differently I guess we are to assume WaterLase?

    Only if no other wavelengths get posted 😉
    Jeff, I always try to post wavelength rather than brand.

    QUOTE
    I thought we were going to give out treatment parameters, tip size, duration, etc. I never see Hertz posted in WaterLase posts, even if it is fixed, it would be helpful in treatment interpretation.

    Sorry, I left out G4 tip and the Waterlase (er,cr:YSGG )is fixed at 20H. Tx time approx. 1 minute. My fault for posting between patients.

    Time for some other wavelength users to post similar cases!

    #10414 Reply

    Benchwmer
    Spectator

    Ron,
    Here is how it is done with a pulsed, FR, Nd:YAG, contact fiber, 3.0W 20 Hz 110usec, less than a minute.
    3 point infiltration, 2% Carbocaine w/ 1/20,000 Levordefrin

    Mont4400.jpg
    Before treatment

    Mont4400A.jpg

    Immediately after treatment

    Mont41800.jpg

    two weeks post-op

    #10410 Reply

    whitertth
    Spectator

    nice job!!

    #10416 Reply

    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I look at the pictures and know this is great fun learning all these new methods. This is such a tremendous forum to share on.

    I have found that the difference in wavelength (and therefore the tissue interaction) of the laser made a significant difference in the removal of a fibroma as you have presented. With regards to the depth of the cut you make – the fibroma should be the determining factor. With the erbium or the Diode you must decide where you will make your cut. Many times the tissue will feel the same and it is hard to differentiate what you’re removing from tissue you wish to keep. I also see this dilemma in the questions that are posed. With the FR Nd:YAG used in a selective ablation mode these tissues are recognizable and are able to be distinguished one from the other and separated. Thus you are able to remove the complete fibroma without sacrificing any additional tissue unnecessarily. Now that Bob has the camera and scope set up we will post the next one of these we remove – I hope he lets me use the camera!

    #10418 Reply

    Robert Gregg DDS
    Spectator

    NOPE!! uh, ah. ain’t sharin’….:biggrin:

    #10415 Reply

    Benchwmer
    Spectator

    Here is my first fibroma removal using the OpusDuoE.
    10 Hz 350mJ using a 800micron tapered sapphire contact tip for less than 30 sec.
    LA 2% Carbocaine w/ 1/20,000 Levordefren, tripod technique (3 drops in triangle surrounding lesion in mucosa)

    Before

    Erb1A.jpg

    Immediately after
    Erb2A.jpg

    Next time I’ll use a 200 or 400micron tapered tip for more focused tissue response.

    Jeff

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 21 total)
Reply To: fibroma removal
Your information: