Forums Erbium Lasers General Erbium Discussion First go at it not too succesful

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 2 posts - 16 through 17 (of 17 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #6172 Reply

    d2thdr
    Spectator

    Well , damn!!

    Glenn learned something from me. I love this place. Shared info is wonderful. It fills in all the little holes, we didn’t know we had.

    I’ll report soon.

    #6177 Reply

    lagunabb
    Spectator

    It was back in late 2003 that we (Glenn, Ron and I) had a discussion about water spray rates for the different brands.  I recall at the time that flow rates for the Delight was around 10 ml/min and 20 ml/min for the Waterlase.     For the Waterlase, water rates changes some with air pressure.  Both approaches seem to work fine for the respective machines.  Since the water delivery approach between the canula (Delight) and nozzle (Waterlase) is so different, why is everyone wanting to copy the ~20ml/min rate of the Waterlase?  In fact Glenn made a comment, based on some published research,  that he thought something lower than 10 ml/min may be optimal.   Was there some research done between late-2003 and recently  that shows better results at 20 ml/min for the Delight?  How about the MD, what’s the rate for that since the nozzle design has supposedly been improved.

    (Edited by lagunabb at 10:20 am on Jan. 5, 2005)

Viewing 2 posts - 16 through 17 (of 17 total)
Reply To: First go at it not too succesful
Your information: