Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 7,576 through 7,590 (of 8,498 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: national laser technology #9273

    jetsfan
    Spectator

    To continue about National Laser Tech:
    I had a real nice guy named Kevin in my office to do the “tune-up” on the laser. Kevin is a former Biolase employee, and my sense is that there are other like him at NLT.
    He explained the process, why it needs to be done, and showed me everything. He spent 1.5-2 hours in the office. Filters were inspected & changed, fibers inspected and polished, mirrors inspected and polished, machine calibrated, and much more. The best was the fan noise reduction kit. All WL owners know how loud the machine is, in fact when it is turned off it is somewhat of a relief to the ears. NLT has this fan noise reduction kit for about 400 bucks that reduces noise by approx 80%. IF the noise bothers you , this would be worth the call.
    They are also coming out with a software MD upgrade ,for approx &#36500 , which will allow WL users to vary frequency and pulse duration.
    I talked about replacement fibers. They sell refurbished fibers for ~&#36500. They claim there is no need to spend &#361800 on a new fiber. Many fibers we get are already refurbished, they claim.

    Robert

    in reply to: cavitations #5461

    dmd92east
    Spectator

    Actually on a serious note. Look into cold laser therapy. Soliton Q1000 has some interesting stuff on alveolitis which is essentially what this is.

    in reply to: national laser technology #9274

    JanetCentury
    Spectator

    Do they work with the DeLight as well?

    in reply to: cavitations #5466

    Nicholas Meyer
    Spectator

    Ed,
    You can contact Allen Sprinkle of Arlington, Texas. ( +1 (817) 461-9998). He treats cavitations, has a Periolase. His approach is different. The periolase itself is a big aid but not the total solution.

    Nick Meyer

    in reply to: What’s the best hard tissue laser?? #6650

    brucesown
    Spectator

    Nick,

    That’s one of the most intelligent things I’ve heard in a long time. Thanks.

    in reply to: General Diode Forum #3007

    cadavis
    Spectator

    I have a 980nm diode (Sirolase) and a patient with a hemangioma on his lower lip. It is approx 1cm X 1.5cm in size. I have seen two discussions on the tx of these lesions. One was out of contact tx. The other was incise, drain, re-enter to destroy walls. I am thinking of going with the invasive option using 320um fiber, 3W, 10hz, large volume suction.
    It is my understanding that you incise, allow to drain, then re-enter at same setting, and make full circle laterally to destroy inner walls of hemangioma area. Is this correct. Also, would 20 seconds be sufficient (or excessive?)

    Any input would be appreciated.

    Chris Davis

    in reply to: diode for hemangioma tx #7992

    Benchwmer
    Spectator

    On ALD (Academy Laser Dentistry) site DR. Hatcher-Rice shows this exact case with diode.
    Check her parameters. 20 seconds sounds like too much laser with diode.
    Jeff

    in reply to: diode for hemangioma tx #7997

    cadavis
    Spectator

    Thanks Jeff,
    I’ll check it out.

    Chris Davis

    in reply to: diode for hemangioma tx #7993

    Benchwmer
    Spectator

    I had a minute, Winter 2004 Wavelength Journal
    Paraphrasing case:
    she used 830nM Diode
    600 micron fiber
    Continuous wave, 1.0 Watt
    She started 10mm away defocused, moved towards lesion, entered lesion, circular motion inside venous lake, then defocused for hemostatis. Total time 1 minute.
    With your parameters and 320 fiber, less than 10 seconds within lesion.
    Jeff

    in reply to: diode for hemangioma tx #7998

    cadavis
    Spectator

    good info,
    thanks

    Chris Davis

    in reply to: diode for hemangioma tx #7996

    Kenneth Luk
    Spectator

    be ware of heat building up.
    Chance of scare formation/loss of lip pigmentation with excessive power ?
    You can always touch up if the area is not completely healed after a few months.
    Ken

    (Edited by Kenneth Luk at 1:41 pm on Sep. 5, 2006)

    in reply to: Ergonomics #5366

    Kenneth Luk
    Spectator

    Glenn,
    Heard that Sony will introduce Hi def with HDD early next yr.
    I’ve finalised on the operatory layout and work is underway. Will post you the photo when the job’s done.
    Thank you all for sharing your advises and showing me your op set up.
    Ken

    in reply to: diode for hemangioma tx #7999

    cadavis
    Spectator

    Thanks Ken.

    Good tip

    in reply to: Lasers for extractions #11029

    Hubert
    Spectator

    Hi Glenn,

    wonderful case and documentation-as always. You seem to be the inspiring soul to the laser community- I too have employed your laser-assisted extraction procedure to the point where it is the standard now.

    I’d like to discuss the diode part a bit further. Do you use 810 or 980nm? Could you clinically find a difference between both with 980 having a higher absorption in water in regards to coagulation and cutting efficiency?
    Do you discern between starting off with a hot tip or a clean fiber?
    Seems like insomnia is also common between laser people, no?
    Take care
    H.

    in reply to: diode for hemangioma tx #7994

    Hubert
    Spectator

    George Romanos from Frankfurt, now New York, has discribed a case of hemangioma removal with a diode laser under an ice-cube. The ice-cube is put on top of the lesion. It should be translucent for better transmission. Laser beam is aimed at lesion through the ice cube in non-contact to the tissue. Because of the cooling pain is seldom reported. The size of the hemagioma seems to shrink immediately, tissue turns greyish-white under tx.

    The rationale to this tx is as follows: Shrinkage of tissue occurs through cooling which in return leads to higher concentration of -pigmented-red bloodcells which leads to higher absorption of laser energy.
    I have not had the chance to do one myself but the rationale seems convincing and George R. is a very bright guy. Sorry, I have not found parameters used other than 8 Watts. The case is presented in his book “Atlas der chirurgischen Laserzahnheilkunde”, Urban and Fischer.

    Hope this helps
    Best
    H.

Viewing 15 posts - 7,576 through 7,590 (of 8,498 total)