Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 6,631 through 6,645 (of 8,497 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: General Erbium Discussion #2912

    dkimmel
    Spectator

    This morning I was going through Manni’s book to get me ready to pick on Bob and Del next weekend and came across the Fotona’s lasers.
    It does appear that Lares is now marketing this laser in the states.


    http://www.fotona.si/medical/fidelis_plus.asp

    It” target=”_blank”>http://www.laresdental.com/product….

    http does have a variable pulse rate 2-50HZ I could not find the breakout of what is between 2 and 50 and how many different pulse rates it has.

    Pulse duration is also variable 50us,100us , 300us, 600us and 1000us.
    It does appear to be a digital unit as the pulses durations are square.

    It is used out of contact except for soft tissue where it can be used in contact.

    The variable pulse duration is interesting. At 1000us it would seem that there would be a bit of heat. Then again at 2 HZ it would be interesting to see the effect on soft tissue and caries. 100 us at enamel sounds about right. I like the idea of 600us for soft tissue.

    We all know how carious dentin can be a pain to remove with the ER at times. It would be interesting to see how using 50us and varing the pulse rate as well as 300 us. It seems 1000us would be too much at the higher HZ but at 2 HZ it would interesting to see.

    It does seem Fotona believes at the 50us pulse is better because it is faster then the thermal diffusion in dental tissue and faster than the formation of the albation cloud above the tissue.

    Anyone out there played with this unit?

    Interesting how what used to be thought of as a marketing ploy seems to becoming rather mainstream.:)

    in reply to: Continuing Education #3031

    Robert Gregg DDS
    Spectator

    Hi All:

    Just learned this weekend (July 4th) from Dr George Romanos, Clinical Professor, Dept of Implant Dentistry, NYU, that he is planning a laser symposium on November 4th, 5th, 6th 2005.

    Dr Romanos has been invloved with laser for a long time, primarily researching CO2 and FRP Nd:YAG and wound healing. George has a book coming out soon on laser research (15% he says reviews Nd:YAG). Quintessence will be publishing after translation from German. He was very excited to hear Yukna’s Nd:YAG/LANAP presentation at the Las Vegas Dental Implant Institute annual meeting.

    His target is 500 dentists attendees.

    Speakers are largely going to be from the European Society of Laser Applications (ESOLA) and thus will include many speakers not heard often in USA.

    He’d better get rolling as that’s not very far off!

    Bob

    in reply to: PowerLAse AT #7109

    Glenn van As
    Spectator

    David….saw it in Australia where it has a big following as Laurie Walsh likes it.

    The people selling it are really respected and they also sell the KTP bleaching (green light) units.

    What I saw was an articulated arm. A big unit. IT cut very fast on the videos in the anterior but in non contact mode it would seem to be very difficult to use in the posterior.

    That is about what I can tell you.

    Glenn

    in reply to: PowerLAse AT #7112

    Robert Gregg DDS
    Spectator

    Hey David,

    Nice try! You’re still in the Front Row!

    1000 usec is 1000usec and just too dang long of exposure time to either hard or soft tissue even at low rep rates.

    The medical laser companies doing research in dermatology laser applications and skin resurfacing figured that out a while ago for skin. I’ll tell you later this week what they discovered……..;)

    Bob

    in reply to: PowerLAse AT #7103

    dkimmel
    Spectator

    Not the front row.!
    That’s like church. Darn hard to sleep on the front row!!!!

    in reply to: PowerLAse AT #7100

    Anonymous
    Spectator
    QUOTE
    Quote: from dkimmel on 9:01 am on July 3, 2005
    This morning I was going through Manni’s book to get me ready to pick on Bob and Del next weekend and came across the  Fotona’s lasers.
    It does appear that Lares is now marketing this laser in the states.
    <a href="http://www.laresdental.com/products/yag/plat_spec.asp

    http://www.fotona.si/medical/fidelis_plus.asp

    It” target=”_blank”>http://www.laresdental.com/product….

    http does have a variable pulse rate 2-50HZ I could not find the breakout of what is between 2 and 50 and how many different pulse rates it has.

    Pulse duration is also variable 50us,100us , 300us, 600us and 1000us.
    It does appear to be a digital unit as the pulses durations are square.

    It is used out of contact except for soft tissue where it can be used in contact.

    The variable pulse duration is interesting.  At 1000us it would seem that there would be a bit of heat. Then again at 2 HZ it would be interesting to see the effect on soft tissue and caries. 100 us at enamel sounds about right. I like the idea of 600us for soft tissue.

    We all know how carious dentin can be a pain to remove with the ER at times. It would be interesting to see how using 50us and varing the pulse rate as well as 300 us.  It seems 1000us would be too much at the higher HZ but at  2 HZ it would interesting to see.

    It does seem Fotona believes at the 50us pulse is better because it is faster then the thermal diffusion in dental tissue and faster than the formation of the albation cloud above the tissue.

    Anyone out there played with this unit?

    Interesting how what used to be thought of as a marketing ploy seems to becoming rather mainstream.:)

    David,
    In the J Oral Laser Applications 2004 ;4,
    there is an article regarding this laser and its cutting efficiency. The conclusion was –“The study shows that optimal erbium dental laser pulses are of approximately 50usec duration.At this duration,both the heat diffusion and derbris screening effects are minimized, leading to very efficient laser ‘drilling’. The laser ablation speeds under these conditions are larger than those achieved by classical mechanical burs”

    M&M was 450mj w/ varible pulse durations from 50-1000usec

    Results- ” the analysis of the results show that the ablation efficiency increases by a factor of 5 when the pulse durations are decreased from 1000 to 50 usec.”

    As an aside, I spent some time talking w/ a user at the ALD (Fotona ERII-erbium only)and he was very pleased with the laser and didn’t seem to think that the articulated arm was a problem-long enough and flexible enough. He did say he thought it would be awhile before it was sold in the US due to the patent lawsuits happening at the time.

    Hopefully, Bob will share the 1000usec comments with all of us. IMO the ability to use a very short pulse duration in this laser may indicate some future direction for their competitors.

    Happy 4th everyone!

    in reply to: PowerLAse AT #7114

    Robert Gregg DDS
    Spectator

    Hopefully, Bob will share the 1000usec comments with all of us. IMO the ability to use a very short pulse duration in this laser may indicate some future direction for their competitors.

    It has been my long held belief (since 1996-7) that the parameteres for erbium cutting of enamel, dentin and soft tissue have not been well studied or established in tissue models or in vivo studies, before devices have been designed and sold in the marketplace.

    Fotona’s 50usec PD for hard tissue is a step in the right direction, where 1000 is not. I believe the Fidelis/Powerlase AT was designed about 10 years ago in Slovakia, so it really pre-dates the present erbium laser designs by a few years……..

    I’ve previously said that I think we are seeing the early to middle term stages of erbium technology that addresses the delivery issues and the device parameters.

    Unlike Nd:YAG which has overcome and addressed the deficiencies of the early devices (in the Periolase MVP-7), erbiums still have a ways to go.

    As long as there ae engineers and business men making guesses at what works clinically, instead of investing in basic science and in vivo clinical research–by people who know what they are doing and looking for clinically–then we will see the continued Darwinian development of erbiums.

    The thermal relaxation constant is the time it takes for 50% of the heat applied to a substance to dissipate. 1000 usec is well beyond the TRC for soft tissue. I have not found any use for long pulse duration on hard tissues that I could reproduce in vivo……

    Bob

    in reply to: PowerLAse AT #7119

    Swpmn
    Spectator

    I’m evaluating the Lares PowerLase AT this weekend in Orlando. Help me make a list of questions.

    Unit also has a free-running pulsed 1064nm Nd:YAG with 15Watt maximum Average Power. Whew that seems like a lot!

    Pulse Duration on Nd:YAG is 100, 180 and 320usec. No 650? Repitition rate 10-100Hz.

    Erbium is delivered via articulated arm, Nd:YAG from a separate optical fiber.

    in reply to: Facial decay sub-g, gingivectomy #5654

    ASI
    Spectator

    Matt,

    Very nicely handled. Was another laser used to remove the decay?

    Andrew

    in reply to: PowerLAse AT #7117

    Swpmn
    Spectator
    QUOTE
    J Oral Laser Applications 2004 ;4,
    there is an article regarding this laser and its cutting efficiency. The conclusion was “The study shows that optimal erbium dental laser pulses are of approximately 50usec duration.At this duration,both the heat diffusion and derbris screening effects are minimized, leading to very efficient laser ‘drilling’. The laser ablation speeds under these conditions are larger than those achieved by classical mechanical burs”

    M&M  was 450mj w/ varible pulse durations from 50-1000usec

    Results- ” the analysis of the results show that the ablation efficiency increases by a factor of 5 when the pulse durations are decreased from 1000 to 50 usec.”

    Do we have Internet access to the entire paper or if someone has hard copy, could you fax it to me at 727-466-0197(preferably within 24 hours)?

    Thanx,

    Al

    in reply to: PowerLAse AT #7104

    dkimmel
    Spectator

    Allen checkout the HP and let me know how they are . They look a little big?rock.gif

    in reply to: General Nd:YAG Forum #2779

    Swpmn
    Spectator

    Nd:YAG users please help me understand the differences between two currently recommended  protocols for treatment of periodontitis.  Lares Laser SoftCare and Millennium Dental Technologies(MDT) Laser Periodontal Therapy(LPT):

    A) Diagnosis phase similar.

    B) Laser SoftCare appears to advocate that the hygienist initially debrides calculus/plaque from the patient with an ultrasonic scaler.  Nd:YAG laser is not used during this phase.  Root planing/scaling with hand instruments is performed conventionally.

    C) Laser Periodontal Therapy protocol indicates that initially the dentist, using chemical anesthesia, applies the Nd:YAG at 100-150usec Pulse Duration(PD) to open a gingival trough around the affected teeth.  This provides access to the root structure for removal of calculus and also some degree of coagulation.  Then the dentist uses an ultrasonic or perhaps piezoelectric scaler plus hand instruments to remove calculus.

    D) Laser SoftCare implies that during the second phase of treatment(after hygienist debridement), the dentist applies the Nd:YAG fiber at 120usec PD to vaporize epithelial lining, debriding the pocket(sulcular debridement).  Coagulation is also achieved during this phase and if necessary PD is increased to 300usec to provide increased coagulation.

    E) Laser Periodontal Therapy seems to indicate that during the closing phase, a PD greater than 300usec and perhaps up to 650usec may be necessary to achieve proper coagulation.  This results in a stable fibrin clot which provides the scaffolding for true regeneration of the periodontium including cementum, osseous structures and periodontal ligament.  Here I’m a bit unclear on PD necessary to finish the procedure – some references I have show final PD as 150-650usec.

    F) Both protocols mention pressure to compress tissue against the root surface and stabilize the clot.

    G) MDT LPT protocol includes adjustment of occlusion and splinting of mobile teeth.

    Thanks for your help,

    in reply to: PowerLAse AT #7108

    Glenn van As
    Spectator

    Allen today in the throwaway journal Dental Products Review I saw an ad for the Lares laser (NdYag and Erbium Yag ) that said for the first time ever a laser was faster than the handpiece. They also have a stand alone erbium.

    I would like to know the study (there was a graph which I didnt spend alot of time looking at).

    Next off how does it cut posterior teeth, are there contact or close to contact tips or is it a window. It cut fine on the videos I saw in the anterior with a window but no tips, but in the posterior that is darn hard.

    Let me know what you think of the articulated arm. How often does it need replacement, they told me it had gold mirrors on the inside which didnt need replacement often. Again this was in Australia and I really like the guys there, they were great with me. They had a big following there.

    Its a big unit but interesting enough and its great that you are able to test it out. Its neat to see everyone here just trying to find both the good and bad things from each laser.

    As Bob said , with time the almost perfect Erbium will arrive.

    cya

    Glenn

    in reply to: PowerLAse AT #7102

    Anonymous
    Spectator

    Glenn,
    The laser has both a window tip and smaller, more conventional tips (don’t remember if contact or not). Looking at the procedures shown in N.O. I remember thinking that ,other than biostim, I couldn’t imagine using the ‘window tip’ for much. Seems like it would be very difficult to aim at your target.

    I hope our newest members from Fotona, in Slovenia, will participate in this discussion and give us some insight.

    Allen, you have a fax this morning and we look forward to hearing your impressions.

    in reply to: Laser SoftCare vs. Laser Periodontal Therapy #5963

    Anonymous
    Spectator

    Allen, I can’t speak to the Lares protocol but you have the Millenium LPT down pretty well. As far as PD for the final pass coagulation, I find that I’m most often in the 550-650 usec range, although in some anterior areas I have decreased that significantly even going as low as 150. It does vary with the pocket and surrounding tissue.
    I can’t imagine a hygienist 1st doing SRP. How are they going to get adequate access? Is Lares still providing their training via CD?

Viewing 15 posts - 6,631 through 6,645 (of 8,497 total)