Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 6,826 through 6,840 (of 8,497 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: General Erbium Discussion #2960

    dkimmel
    Spectator

    Sometimes I am a bit slow… I have always found checking the mirrior very hard to do on the MD. The waterlase was real simple and easy. The MD just was tough to see….
    Then it hit me…… There is a fiberoptic light in the trunk fiber. Just pull the trunkfiber out about a half an inch an Bam you can see the mirror as clear as day…..
    I maybe slow but I am getting there!!!!!!
    David

    in reply to: MD Mirrior check #7588

    Glenn van As
    Spectator

    what the heck is a trunk fiber, what the heck is a mirror……why the heck do you have to check all this darn stuff……………

    BIG BIG GRIN

    Just kidding, great information for the Waterlase crowd and as always you provide great insight into how to handle these little inconveniences.

    Glenn

    in reply to: chisel tip for Opus? #6524

    cadavis
    Spectator

    Thanks for the reply. Guess I’m out of luck until Opus gets on the ball.

    in reply to: Lares Research #8508

    cadavis
    Spectator

    I joined the ALD recently, although I really wish I hadn’t. I took the standard proficiency course through OpusDent (Symphony of Light). It was supposedly ALD certified. The program binder actually had a seal stating “ALD RECOGNIZED STANDARD PROFICIENCY PROVIDER” right on the cover. Unfortunately, I found out that ALD no longer recognizes OpusDent, so my certification is invalid from their point of view. They said I’d have to take it over again by one of “their” instructors. I apparently can’t go on to more advanced certification until I do.
    So I wasted good money on a membership in a f***ed up organization. That’s what I get for not doing my homework.

    Chris Davis

    in reply to: MD Mirrior check #7590

    Swpmn
    Spectator

    Mirror?

    Oh yeah, I think I remember something about that from last year:biggrin:

    in reply to: Lares Research #8488

    Glenn van As
    Spectator

    Now Chris, my question is why does the ALD not recognize Opus Dent.

    I would like to know this. I am a member of the ALD and I can easily touch base with some people I know to find out some more information for you about this.

    Do you want to take the ALD standard proficiency exam. I would definitely get Opus to pay for your course then or start a minor war with them.

    I can ask Ken Magid if he knows what is going on with Opus to find out about this.

    Please let me know if you want me to help you find out how to get to the bottom of this. I would first approach the Opus people and see if they wont get you accredited (because the arent) then I would demand that they pay for your testing with the ALD. After all you paid for their laser, its the least they can do.

    Let me know if you want me to lean on a few people for you.

    Give me some more details about what happened.

    Thanks

    Glenn

    in reply to: chisel tip for Opus? #6522

    Glenn van As
    Spectator

    I would try and put some pressure on them to get the tip and to develop them. It seems as if Opus is not doing a heck of a lot these days.

    Maybe I will contact Ken Magid and ask him about some of the issues you are having.

    Please email me at glennvanas@shaw.ca

    Ken is always talking about how good his Opus is and I was just wondering what is happening at the company with respect to the ALD certification you are talking about and the lack of tips being developed.

    Glenn

    in reply to: Lares Research #8499

    Robert Gregg DDS
    Spectator

    Glenn, Al, and All,

    ALD is increasingly isolating themself. They have never recognized MDT’s Standard Proficiency even when we were corporate members, Certified Dental Laser Educators, etc.

    Course recognition is only for the Chosen Few and those who meet mystery requirements–including money of course.

    It gets better.

    I am at the CDA San Francisco Sept 10, 2005.

    There was a “Lasers in Dentistry” seminar put on today by Joel White, Don Coluzzi, and Peter Reichman–sometimes known and identified through their close association with the ALD–Recognized “Big S” standard proficiency providers and all.;)

    Nearly every laser company in attendance at the CDA was representated at the seminar from what I could see as I stood and looked in the open door. Millennium’s participation was refused.

    There were multiple diodes represented, multiple erbiums plateforms represented, other FRP Nd:YAGs represented.

    But the only FRP Nd:YAG (the Periolase) with 7 variable pulse durations, a built-in power meter, joule counter, procedure driven menu calibrated for a new and exclusive FDA perio clearance for “laser assisted new attachment procedure” (LANAP) was refused participation.:confused:

    Fascinating………..

    A few manufacturers who were included later asked me why we didn’t participate. When I told them we were not allowed to participate after requesting to do so, they were incredulous.:confused: :confused:

    This is the second show–the AGD in Washington DC was the first–where we were told that the sponsor could exclude whomever they wanted.

    Just an FYI to those who think its just isolated, accidental, or temporary.
    Bob

    in reply to: New Member Welcome #9335

    dkimmel
    Spectator

    toothman51
    Welcome, enjoy the Forum.

    in reply to: Perio #5420

    etienne
    Spectator

    Hi Bob
    Thanks very much for the info. Where can I get details on courses that you offer? It seems as if another visit to the States is in order!!
    Take care
    Etienne

    in reply to: Lares Research #8489

    Glenn van As
    Spectator

    Bob , that is sad to see. I wonder why there are these political games in the ALD arena. I for one think that there is room fo rall the laser companies to be involved.

    I dont really know how many lasers are “sold” at these meetings. I think many come to hear what lasers can do. The buying time often takes 6-7 exposures before someone will buy anyways.

    I hope that it all gets rectified. I like the ALD because of its science basis. I have learned alot from the academy but I hate the political aspect of what seems to be a common occurrence and I hope that eventually it will return to a clinical, less political arena with the emphasis on science and less on rhetoric.

    Hope the rest of the meeting is better for you.

    Sincerely,

    Glenn

    in reply to: Lares Research #8505

    Swpmn
    Spectator
    QUOTE
    I joined the ALD recently, although I really wish I hadn’t.   I took the standard proficiency course through OpusDent (Symphony of Light).  It was supposedly ALD certified.  The program binder actually had a seal stating “ALD RECOGNIZED STANDARD PROFICIENCY PROVIDER” right on the cover.  Unfortunately, I found out that ALD no longer recognizes OpusDent, so my certification is invalid from their point of view.  They said I’d have to take it over again by one of “their” instructors.  I apparently can’t go on to more advanced certification until I do.  
    So I wasted good money on a membership in a f***ed up organization.  That’s what I get for not doing my homework.

    Chris Davis

    No, no, no, that ain’t gonna work. This is precisely the confusion I was alluding to when starting this thread and now it has come to “light”. With the exception of Lares, the ALD Standard Proficiency Certification can only be obtained via instruction from Recognized dentists or dental hygienists. If anyone does not have access to the list of Recognized Providers I will gladly post the list on the forum.

    Opus WAS a Recognized Provider in 2003 but they are not today. What they are doing Dr. Davis is using the same ALD-stamped course binder they gave myself and Dr. David Kimmel that year. ALD even had a “recruitment booth” in the back of the seminar room. The Academy’s association with Opus that year was a source of controversy.

    Dr. Davis, what you need to do is:

    1) Photocopy your binder which has the ALD logo and send a letter to the ALD DEMANDING that your Standard Proficiency be recognized.

    2) Send a similar letter to Opus DEMANDING:
    a) A full refund of course fee or,
    b) As Dr. van As suggested, Opus pay the fee for you to obtain Standard Proficiency at the Source 2006 in Arizona

    Do not let this go. It is absolutely absurd that a doctor can be led to believe they are obtaining ALD Standard Proficiency and then being told the course was not recognized.

    Al

    in reply to: Perio #5415

    etienne
    Spectator

    Oh yes, one more thing. I attended a course a while back in Dr Martelli’s office in Florence. He seems to use the Nd:YAG wavelength in combination with PRP quite extensively for the treatment of perio lesions as well as augmenting extraction sites. He was saying that the PRP in combination with laser is much more effective than PRP on its own.
    Any ideas on this?
    Thanks
    Etienne

    in reply to: Soft Tissue Procedures #3315

    etienne
    Spectator

    I had an interesting discussion with an orthodontist this morning concerning laser.

    1. Could anyone tell me what lasers are used for by othodontists at this time?

    2.He mentioned that under certain circumstances (adult ortho after tooth loss) it is difficult to close gaps where teeth had been lost. Apparently it seems as if the tissue “bunches up” (osseus as well as soft tissue?) which causes complications during treatment. As far as I understood this is more of a problem with adults and less so with kids. Any use for laser in this specific situation?
    Thanks very much
    Etienne

    in reply to: Perio #5434

    Robert Gregg DDS
    Spectator

    Etienne,

    LANAP is better than PRP alone as you suggest, and PRP does not enhance LANAP.

    Bob

Viewing 15 posts - 6,826 through 6,840 (of 8,497 total)