Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 7,441 through 7,455 (of 8,497 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Parathesia Reversal #5927

    Robert Gregg DDS
    Spectator

    Keep going, both proximal and distal aspects.

    Bob

    in reply to: Endo/Perio #5591

    Robert Gregg DDS
    Spectator

    Greetings Etienne,

    Nice treatment!

    The appearance of the gingival tissues after FRP Nd:YAG lasing shows smart application of energy used–i.e. no recession. I’m thinking you used very little energy, on the order of 30 seconds for that result.

    While the tissue still has “issues”, you can always go back and treat again once they firm up and the inflamation has resolved some.

    How long between 1st and 2nd appts?

    What sort of antibiotics did you prescribe?

    Thanks,

    Bob

    in reply to: Endo/Perio #5579

    etienne
    Spectator

    Hi Bob
    Thanks! Yes, you are correct, there was so little bone that I wanted to treat it very gently.

    The pockets measured up to 12mm, so I do expect to need a few more treatments.

    The pictures were taken on a Monday and following Friday, so little time for healing. I am seeing her again two weeks after the previous appointment and plan to complete the root treatment then. I prescribed Augmentin 1000mg bd.

    How would you advise treating the lesion further? When would you go into the perio lesion again, taking into account that I am going to use the laser for the endo as well?

    I suppose for somebody like yourself with all your laser experience this stuff is boring ;)) I really appreciate your advice!

    Take care
    Etienne

    in reply to: Endo/Perio #5585

    Robert Gregg DDS
    Spectator

    Thanks Etienne,

    No, never boring……….

    Sounds good. I’m guessing you used 150usec, 20 hz, 3.0 watts for 30 seconds? Less power? What were your settings?

    You may not have to retreat that pocket again.

    The next time you numb the patient up, I would gently probe. If you meet the slighest resistance, don’t push. Unless or until there is BOP, or inflamation, I would not retreat to the base of the defect. Keep the gingiva clean and “closed”.

    I would just use the laser in the canal.

    If there is a pocket and/or BOP, I would treat as you did the first time.

    Good luck,

    Bob

    in reply to: Endo/Perio #5580

    etienne
    Spectator

    Hi Bob
    Good guess!! Actually it was 150usec, 20Hz, 4watt for 20sec.
    How long would you wait until you decide to evaluate? I am seeing the patient shortly (next week I think) to complete the endo, would you wait longer?
    If you have BOP or a pocket, would you retreat to the base again?
    What would you say were the chances of saving a tooth like this? 50%? 40% Just wondering.
    Take care
    Etienne

    in reply to: Endo/Perio #5592

    Robert Gregg DDS
    Spectator

    Hi Bob

    Good guess!! Actually it was 150usec, 20Hz, 4watt for 20sec.

    So about 40 Joules, which is well within the tissue tolerances for that tooth and defect size.  Very smart on your part.

    How long would you wait until you decide to evaluate?

    30 days for both the RCT and the perio pocket.

    I am seeing the patient shortly (next week I think) to complete the endo, would you wait longer?

    No, that’s OK.

    If you have BOP or a pocket, would you retreat to the base again?

    Yes, but not with force.

    What would you say were the chances of saving a tooth like this? 50%? 40% Just wondering.

    I’d tell the patient 50%, but I’m thinking more like 90%.

    Take care
    Etienne
    Good luck!

    Bob

    in reply to: Endo/Perio #5581

    etienne
    Spectator

    Hi Bob
    Thanks very much for your note. Do you truly think the chances of saving a tooth like that is as high as 90%? WOW!!

    On another note, do you think the same effect could be reliably achieved using another kind of laser? Say for instance a diode?

    My gut feel is that the difference in wavelength is not that important but the difference in gated pulse vs free running pulse is crucial. What are your thoughts regarding this?
    Thanks!
    Take care
    Etienne

    in reply to: Endo/Perio #5586

    Robert Gregg DDS
    Spectator

    Hi Bob

    Thanks very much for your note. Do you truly think the chances of saving a tooth like that is as high as 90%? WOW!!

    Yes.

    On another note, do you think the same effect could be reliably achieved using another kind of laser? Say for instance a diode?

    No, not reliably……occasionally, not reliably.

    My gut feel is that the difference in wavelength is not that important but the difference in gated pulse vs free running pulse is crucial. What are your thoughts regarding this?

    I agree completely

    Thanks!

    Take care

    Etienne

    Thanks, you too.

    Bob

    in reply to: Endo/Perio #5582

    etienne
    Spectator

    Hi Bob
    So the peak power value is the important thing if I have this correct. Squeezing the same amount of energy into a shorter pulse, with assosiated long pulse delay (thermal relaxation time) is what is helping us here?
    Is there an ideal correlation between pulse delay and pulse energy and total energy for different situations, say endo, perio etc?
    Take care
    Etienne

    in reply to: Interesting article #5811

    etienne
    Spectator

    Hi Bob
    Do you remain several inches from the tooth?

    Do you treat in contact with tooth structure when you etch dentin? Can you suggest a clinical situation where you would want to do that? Any restoration? Care to share the dentin etch setting?
    Thanks
    Etienne

    (Edited by etienne at 3:42 pm on June 6, 2006)

    in reply to: Endo/Perio #5587

    Robert Gregg DDS
    Spectator

    Hi Bob

    So the peak power value is the important thing if I have this correct.  

     Yes.

    Squeezing the same amount of energy into a shorter pulse, with assosiated long pulse delay (thermal relaxation time) is what is helping us here?

    Squeezing the same amount of average power into short pulse duration AND the pulse interval (say of 20 Hz) gives you the mathmatical ratio (duty cycle) between peak power and thermal relaxation, and the biological balance for what you did.

    The ratio of “on” to “off” time (duty cycle) is 0.3% if we use your PD of 150 divided by 50,000 usec in a second at 20 Hz.  So your laser is on for 0.3% and off for 99.7% yet delivers 1500 watts of peak power at 3.00 watt and 20Hz.

    Is there an ideal correlation between pulse delay and pulse energy and total energy for different situations, say endo, perio etc?

    Yes, we believe so.  Optimal combinations of parameters for achieving different clinical objectives?  Yes.

    Take care
    Etienne

    Thanks.  You too.  Bob

    in reply to: Interesting article #5815

    Robert Gregg DDS
    Spectator

    Hi Bob

    Do you remain several inches from the tooth?

    No, I attempt to move in.

    Do you treat in contact with tooth structure when you etch dentin?

    Yes.

    Can you suggest a clinical situation where you would want to do that? Yes. Any restoration? Yes. Care to share the dentin etch setting?

    On your laser? The shortest PD (150 I think) and 300 mj/pulse. Can you get that much mj per pulse?

    Thanks
    Etienne

    Sure. Bob

    in reply to: Waterlase handpiece problem #9280
    QUOTE
    Quote: from dkimmel on 7:21 pm on June 1, 2006
    Lee,
    I just got the kit for the MD. It is pretty cool. It comes with two mirrors.

    But the cost is as much as an in shop repair. You just get an extra mirror for your effort. Maybe someone else will be willing to work on the handpieces soon.

    We can only hope.

    in reply to: Treatment of Failing RCT #10842

    rhuskey
    Spectator

    Jeff – Did you do this treatment gratis, or did you charge a fee? If you did, what was your fee, and what insurance code did you file? Thanks Bob Huskey

    in reply to: Waterlase handpiece problem #9278

    dkimmel
    Spectator

    The kit comes with the extended warrenty.

Viewing 15 posts - 7,441 through 7,455 (of 8,497 total)